Free tool
Compare large-load tariffs side by side
Pick up to three utilities. See status, the contract term, the minimum bill, collateral and exit fee each filing states, with the source. Add a size and a demand charge to see what the minimum costs in dollars.
Comparison
| Salt River Project (SRP) | |
|---|---|
| Status | Approved |
| Applies at | 20 MW or more, or expected by SRP to reach 20 MW within five years (E-67 price plan, "Large Load Account") |
| Last reviewed | 2026-10-17 |
| Contract term | A minimum term is set in the Agreement for Electric Service; the number of years is not stated in the price plan |
| Ramp | Not stated in the filings we read |
| Take-or-pay (minimum bill) | Minimum billing demand of 80% of the customer's forecasted demand for a New Large Load Account (service starting on or after November 1, 2025), reduced if the customer pays for load-serving resources and infrastructure, or at SRP's discretion for economic development |
| Collateral | Not stated in the filings we read |
| Exit fee | Not stated in the filings we read |
| Notice to reduce or end | Not stated in the filings we read |
| Time to power | Not stated in the filings we read |
| Source | SRP E-67 price plan ratebook, effective November 2025 billing cycle (srpnet.com, read in full 2026-10-17); mgrid.org, "Arizona's Attorney General Wants a Data Center Pause, While SRP Puts Them at 5.1% of Peak" (Sept 2026). |
Shaded rows differ between the utilities. Faded values are not stated in the filings we read.
Screening information from public filings, not legal or investment advice. The utility's signed agreement controls. See all coverage · Commitment estimator · Check a site