Free tool
Compare large-load tariffs side by side
Pick up to three utilities. See status, the contract term, the minimum bill, collateral and exit fee each filing states, with the source. Add a size and a demand charge to see what the minimum costs in dollars.
Comparison
| NIPSCO GenCo (Indiana), megaload service through a separate generation company | |
|---|---|
| Status | Approved |
| Applies at | A 'megaload' customer is 50 MW or more under the approved settlement (a consumer group argued for 100 MW) |
| Last reviewed | 2026-10-14 |
| Contract term | Not in structured terms yet; see the source |
| Ramp | Not in structured terms yet; see the source |
| Take-or-pay (minimum bill) | Not in structured terms yet; see the source |
| Collateral | Not in structured terms yet; see the source |
| Exit fee | Not in structured terms yet; see the source |
| Notice to reduce or end | Not in structured terms yet; see the source |
| Time to power | Not in structured terms yet; see the source |
| Source | IURC order in Cause 46183, September 24, 2025 (in.gov/iurc, read in part). |
Shaded rows differ between the utilities. Faded values are not stated in the filings we read.
Screening information from public filings, not legal or investment advice. The utility's signed agreement controls. See all coverage · Commitment estimator · Check a site