Free tool
Compare large-load tariffs side by side
Pick up to three utilities. See status, the contract term, the minimum bill, collateral and exit fee each filing states, with the source. Add a size and a demand charge to see what the minimum costs in dollars.
Comparison
| Alabama Power (Alabama PSC), large data center contract review and special contracts | |
|---|---|
| Status | Law or process only |
| Applies at | 150 MW or more expected peak demand for the state-law review process (Act 2026-610, effective October 1, 2026); 30 MW or more for a special contract under Rate BTAL (Docket U-5024) |
| Last reviewed | 2026-10-14 |
| Contract term | Not in structured terms yet; see the source |
| Ramp | Not in structured terms yet; see the source |
| Take-or-pay (minimum bill) | Not in structured terms yet; see the source |
| Collateral | Not in structured terms yet; see the source |
| Exit fee | Not in structured terms yet; see the source |
| Notice to reduce or end | Not in structured terms yet; see the source |
| Time to power | Not in structured terms yet; see the source |
| Source | Alabama Reflector, Oct 7, 2026 and ABC 33/40 coverage of the PSC vote; Energy Alabama reply comments in Docket 33709; EEI list, Sept 2026. The PSC order itself was not read. |
Shaded rows differ between the utilities. Faded values are not stated in the filings we read.
Screening information from public filings, not legal or investment advice. The utility's signed agreement controls. See all coverage · Commitment estimator · Check a site