Free tool
Compare large-load tariffs side by side
Pick up to three utilities. See status, the contract term, the minimum bill, collateral and exit fee each filing states, with the source. Add a size and a demand charge to see what the minimum costs in dollars.
Comparison
| Madison Gas and Electric (Wisconsin) | |
|---|---|
| Status | Pending |
| Applies at | Not confirmed (the filing was not read; Xcel Wisconsin proposed about 100 MW and the We Energies decision set 100 MW) |
| Last reviewed | 2026-10-14 |
| Contract term | Not in structured terms yet; see the source |
| Ramp | Not in structured terms yet; see the source |
| Take-or-pay (minimum bill) | Not in structured terms yet; see the source |
| Collateral | Not in structured terms yet; see the source |
| Exit fee | Not in structured terms yet; see the source |
| Notice to reduce or end | Not in structured terms yet; see the source |
| Time to power | Not in structured terms yet; see the source |
| Source | EEI list, Sept 2026 (docket numbers); newprojectmedia.com coverage of the Xcel filing; Data Center Knowledge on the We Energies decision. Dockets not read. |
Shaded rows differ between the utilities. Faded values are not stated in the filings we read.
Screening information from public filings, not legal or investment advice. The utility's signed agreement controls. See all coverage · Commitment estimator · Check a site