Free tool
Compare large-load tariffs side by side
Pick up to three utilities. See status, the contract term, the minimum bill, collateral and exit fee each filing states, with the source. Add a size and a demand charge to see what the minimum costs in dollars.
Comparison
| Duke Energy Florida, proposed Large Load Customer Policy (Florida PSC) | |
|---|---|
| Status | Pending |
| Applies at | 50 MW or more of firm load (Peak Contract Demand reasonably expected at or above 50,000 kW at any time in the term) |
| Last reviewed | 2026-10-14 |
| Contract term | 20 years (includes the ramp) |
| Ramp | Not stated in the filings we read |
| Take-or-pay (minimum bill) | 80% of contract capacity billed monthly whether used or not |
| Collateral | Not stated in the filings we read |
| Exit fee | 3 years of minimum bills |
| Notice to reduce or end | 24 months |
| Time to power | Not stated in the filings we read |
| Source | Duke Energy Florida petition and proposed tariff sheets, Docket 20260064-EI, filed April 22, 2026 (floridapsc.com, read); contest from reporting on the docket, not read. |
Shaded rows differ between the utilities. Faded values are not stated in the filings we read.
Screening information from public filings, not legal or investment advice. The utility's signed agreement controls. See all coverage · Commitment estimator · Check a site